Mar

Content of Tax Appeals

Posted By: David M. Piccolo on March 15, 2010 at 1:27:27 in All , Case Comments

Tags : ,

Content of Tax Appeals

In an interesting article on March 13, 2010, Jamie Golombek wrote about a recent decision in the Tax Court of Canada. The issue before the Tax Court of Canada was whether Fidelity Investments Canada ULC had filed a proper notice of objection. According to Mr. Golombek’s article, upon receiving a notice of objection for 2006 for a particular mutual fund, Fidelity sent a letter to CRA asking for 2 adjustments to the notice of assessment. The Tax Court of Canada found that a notice of objection had not been filed by Fidelity.

The actual content of a valid notice of objection can contain as little as “I object to the notice of (re)assessment for the 20XX taxation year.” If the letter is sent to a tax services office, it should meet the requirements found in section 165 of theIncome Tax Act. Further, if such a letter were attached to CRA’s T400a Notice of Objection form, there should be no issue as to whether a notice of objection was filed. While such a letter would be the bare minimum to start the objection process, supplementary information would be required to resolve the objection.

Given the basic nature of such a letter, it is mind-boggling that none of the accountants and lawyers employed or retained by Fidelity were able to locate and resolve the deficiency.

Originally posted on www.piccololaw.ca, used with permission.

Financial Post

TaxChambers LLP articles now featured on the Financial Post.

CATEGORIES

TaxChambers LLP is collaborating with Andersen Global® in Canada.